首页> 外文OA文献 >“\ud One man one job\ud ”\ud : the marriage\ud ban and the employment of women\ud teachers in Irish primary schools
【2h】

“\ud One man one job\ud ”\ud : the marriage\ud ban and the employment of women\ud teachers in Irish primary schools

机译:“ \ ud 一人一职\ ud ” \ ud :婚姻\ ud 禁令和妇女就业\ ud 爱尔兰小学的老师

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In 1932, the Irish government, facing an economic downturn, introduced a marriage\udban which required that female primary school teachers were required to resign on\udmarriage. This followed a series of restrictive legislative measures adopted by Irish\udgovernments throughout the 1920s which sought to limit women’s participation in\udpublic life and the public sector. Such a requirement emerged in several countries\udin response to high unemployment and applied principally to women’s white-collar\udoccupations, leading some commentators to argue that it stemmed from a social\udconsensus rather than an economic rationale. Despite opposition to the ban from\udthe Irish National Teachers’ Organisation (INTO) on the basis that it was\udunconstitutional, would lead to fewer marriages and that married women were in\udfact more suited to teaching children, it remained in place until 1958. Although the\udban is much referred to as part of the gender ideology that informed legislation in\udthe early years of independent Ireland, the particular history of married women\udteachers has been little researched in the academic context. Over 50 years since the\udrescinding of the ban, this article examines its impact through an analysis of primary\udsources, including government cabinet minutes and the public commentary of the\udINTO and positions this history within the international context.
机译:1932年,面对经济不景气的爱尔兰政府提出了婚姻\ udban的规定,要求小学女教师必须辞职。在此之前,爱尔兰\ ud政府在1920年代采取了一系列限制性立法措施,旨在限制妇女参与\ udpublic生活和公共部门。这样的要求在一些国家针对高失业率的情况下出现,并且主要适用于女性的白领\假职业,导致一些评论家认为这是出于社会\共识而不是经济原理。尽管反对爱尔兰国家教师组织(INTO)的禁令的依据是,这种禁令是违宪的,会导致更少的婚姻,而且已婚妇女实际上更适合教孩子,但该禁令一直存在到1958年尽管“城市居民”被广泛认为是在独立爱尔兰成立初期为立法提供依据的性别意识形态的一部分,但在学术背景上很少研究已婚妇女“城市教师”的特殊历史。自禁令解除以来的50多年来,本文通过对主要\来源的分析(包括政府内阁会议纪要和\ udINTO的公开评论)来分析其影响,并将这一历史定位于国际背景下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号